Diagnostic performance of CMR imaging compared with EMB in patients with suspected myocarditis.

نویسندگان

  • Philipp Lurz
  • Ingo Eitel
  • Julia Adam
  • Julia Steiner
  • Matthias Grothoff
  • Steffen Desch
  • Georg Fuernau
  • Suzanne de Waha
  • Mahdi Sareban
  • Christian Luecke
  • Karin Klingel
  • Reinhard Kandolf
  • Gerhard Schuler
  • Matthias Gutberlet
  • Holger Thiele
چکیده

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) compared with endomyocardial biopsy in patients with suspected acute myocarditis (AMC) and chronic myocarditis (CMC). BACKGROUND Several studies have reported an encouraging diagnostic performance of CMR in myocarditis. However, the comparison of CMR with clinical data only and the use of preselected patient populations are important limitations of the majority of these reports. METHODS One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with suspected AMC (defined by symptoms ≤ 14 days; n = 70) and CMC (defined by symptoms >14 days; n = 62) were included. Patients underwent cardiac catheterization with left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy and CMR, including T(2)-weighted imaging for assessment of edema, T(1)-weighted imaging before and after contrast administration for evaluation of hyperemia, and assessment of late gadolinium enhancement. CMR results were considered to be consistent with the diagnosis of myocarditis if 2 of 3 CMR techniques were positive. RESULTS Within the total population, myocarditis was the most common diagnosis on endomyocardial biopsy analysis (62.9%). Viral genomes were detected in 30.3% (40 of 132) of patients within the total patient population and significantly more often in patients with AMC than CMC (40.0% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.013). For the overall cohort of patients with either suspected AMC or CMC, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CMR were 76%, 54%, and 68%, respectively. The best diagnostic performance was observed in patients with suspected AMC (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 71%; and accuracy, 79%). In contrast, diagnostic performance of CMR in suspected CMC was found to be unsatisfactory (sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 40%; and accuracy, 52%). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study underline the usefulness of CMR in patients with suspected AMC. In contrast, the diagnostic performance of CMR in patients with suspected CMC might not be sufficient to guide clinical management.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis: The MyoRacer-Trial.

BACKGROUND Data suggest that T1 and T2 mapping have excellent diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected myocarditis. However, the true diagnostic performance of comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) mapping versus endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has not been determined. OBJECTIVES This study assessed the performance of CMR imaging, including T1 and T2 mapping, compared with EMB in a...

متن کامل

The potential additional diagnostic value of assessing for pericardial effusion on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected myocarditis.

BACKGROUND The presence of pericardial effusion (PE) is considered to be suggestive of inflammation in suspected myocarditis. However, the incremental value of assessing for PE in addition to comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging remains unclear. METHODS In total, 132 patients with suspected acute (AMC) or chronic myocarditis (CMC) were included. All patients underwent endomy...

متن کامل

The value of cardiac magnetic resonance in the prediction of left ventricular function improvement following acute myocarditis

Background Although cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has good diagnostic performance in myocarditis, an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is still required when treatment against the underlying etiology is considered. Many patients however have a good prognosis following myocarditis and will therefore not benefit from an EMB. The ability of CMR to predict outcomes in these patients may therefore guid...

متن کامل

Interventional Cardiology Comparative Evaluation of Left and Right Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy Differences in Complication Rate and Diagnostic Performance

Background—Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) represents the gold standard for diagnosing myocarditis and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. This study focuses on the risk of complications and the respective diagnostic performance of left ventricular (LV), right ventricular (RV), or biventricular EMB in patients with suspected myocarditis and/or cardiomyopathy of unknown origin. Methods and Results—In this...

متن کامل

Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance.

BACKGROUND Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) represents the gold standard for diagnosing myocarditis and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. This study focuses on the risk of complications and the respective diagnostic performance of left ventricular (LV), right ventricular (RV), or biventricular EMB in patients with suspected myocarditis and/or cardiomyopathy of unknown origin. METHODS AND RESULTS In th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

دوره 5 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012